World-News

The American Conservative
by James Bovard

07/30/07

The torture regime rests on the notion that anyone labeled an enemy combatant deserves whatever harsh treatment he receives. Combatant Status Review Tribunals are used to confirm the guilt of people sent to Guantanamo as enemy combatants, but the tribunals routinely rely on tortured confessions and hearsay evidence, and almost any allegation can be sufficient to perpetuate detention. Candace Gorman, a Chicago attorney representing two Guantanamo detainees, noted that in one case ‘the [tribunal] darkly noted that the prisoner owned a Casio wristwatch (which could conceivably be used to time explosives). … Karate skills, knowledge of computers and participation in the pilgrimage to Mecca have also been considered factors supporting ‘continuing detention.’’ Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, a 26-year Army veteran who had a pivotal role in gathering evidence for the tribunals, filed a sworn affidavit last month declaring that the process of identifying enemy combatants at Guantanamo was a sham and that officers were pressured to find defendants guilty...

https://amconmag.com/2007/2007_07_30/article.html


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=torture
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=enemy+combatant
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Guantanamo
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=detention
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=detainees
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Stephen+Abraham
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Candace+Gorman
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=James+Bovard