Iraq War - Irak Krieg

Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007

Support BINDING Legislation NOW To Stop The Escalation In Iraq

Please call your members of Congress tollfree right now at, 800-828-0498, 800-459-1887 or 800-614-2803, and tell them to vote for S. 233/H. Res. 41.

ACTION PAGE: https://www.peaceteam.net/no_escalation2.php

A couple days ago we called for preemptive resolutions to oppose the unpopular Bush escalation proposed for Iraq. There are now at least two measures pending to do just that. In the Senate, Ted Kennedy has introduced S. 233 which would prohibit the White House from spending any federal funds on an increase of troop levels in Iraq without express Congressional consent. On the House side, Marty Meehan's H Res. 41 would require a parallel authorization. All we have to do is speak out in sufficient numbers and these bills will become law. The overnight polls show that those numbers should definitely be there, if we can just inspire our friends and neighbors to take vocal action. Dennis Kucinich is also bringing forward a resolution to actually mandate a phased withdrawal and we will support that too when it is introduced.

With regards to the Kennedy bill, Harry Reid was quoted yesterday as saying he would "prefer" a non-binding resolution as way of sending a "message" to the president. Despite his recent letter advocating against the escalation, on the point of what actual action to take Harry Reid has it wrong. The only message non-binding resolutions would send is that Congress lacks the courage to confront the incorrigible bullies in the White House. We might as well set up a special conference room in the Capitol for public hand wringing. By defying absolutely the entire rest of the government not including his few remaining quislings, George Bush is deliberately FORCING a Constitutional crisis. We have no choice but to stand up to him directly and immediately.

There were many entirely false premises in Bush's awkward and uncomfortable speech last night. But central to it all was the assertion that the Iraqi people want us in their country to bring them our wonderful democratic system of government. That time is long past. Absolutely every poll there demonstrates they overwhelmingly want us to just leave. The entire world knows George Bush invaded Iraq for the SOLE purpose of stealing their oil resources. Talk about bringing our kind of government to Iraq, they are about to try to force through a new hurry-up hydrocarbon law to cut up and encumber their oil fields that nobody in the Iraqi Parliament there has even read yet. Isn't that the way they used to pass legislation here in our own country, in the middle of the night without even a fair read?

It's not just Democrats, there are many Republicans who increasingly alarmed by the new Bush lurch in the direction of sheer madness. Chuck Hagel was quoted as saying, "This is a dangerously wrong-headed strategy that will drive America deeper into an unwinnable swamp at a great cost." That's an understatement. Although all the pre-speech marketing was about some kind of temporary "surge," Bush used that word not one time in his prepared statement. Instead he painted a picture of at LEAST another year of ever increasing violence, backed up with barely veiled threats to wage full scale war on BOTH Iran and Syria. All those air craft carriers steaming to the Persian Gulf are not going there for R & R. They even have a shiny new naval commander installed in charge of Iraq now, to direct the launch of the cruise missiles.

The plain facts are these. The only reason why the Iraqi people endured the charade of purple finger elections was they thought if they indulged us in that we might actually leave. As fed up as the American public is with our military presence there, the Iraqi people are even more so. Bush has made an unholy alliance with a stooge (al Maliki) of some of the very Islamic militants (al Sadr) they have been rattling sabers at for the last four years. And when he warns that the Iraqi government will fall without being propped up by our uranium spitting gun ships, it is because it is too corrupt and infiltrated to survive on its own. As horrific as the casualties have been so far, under Bush they are just starting.

ACTION PAGE: https://www.peaceteam.net/no_escalation2.php

We must raise every possible voice to call for support of the S. 233 and H. Res 41 right now. These must pass by overwhelming margins. We have very little time. Bush did not even wait to make his announcement to start deploying the new troops. We have an outlaw administration bent on turning a disaster into an utter debacle. Bush must be stopped. And nothing can arrest him but your voices, to pressure your members of Congress to act against him without equivocation or fear.

Please take action NOW, so we can win all victories that are supposed to be ours.

Powered by The People's Email Network
Copyright 2006, Patent pending, All rights reserved
May be reproduced for activist purposes



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

Sources of Bush's new Iraq plan think it 'likely to fail'

https://www.ufppc.org/content/view/5560/


Informant: jensenmk

From ufpj-news



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

The disaster is Bush's war, and he has already failed

The Real Disaster

"President Bush told Americans last night that failure in Iraq would be a disaster. The disaster is Mr. Bush's war, and he has already failed. Last night was his chance to stop offering more fog and be honest with the nation, and he did not take it," writes the New York Times.

https://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011107K.shtml



Escalating War in Iraq Sends Wrong Message

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and Senate Assistant Democratic Leader Richard Durbin have released a statement on President Bush's address to the nation on the war in Iraq.

https://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011107L.shtml



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Pelosi

The Architect of Mr. Bush's Plan

Jason Leopold writes: "By relying on the recommendations of neoconservative scholar Frederick Kagan, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, on what steps the White House should take to address the civil war between Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq, President Bush has once again ignored the advice of career military officials and even some Republican lawmakers - many of whom in recent weeks have urged Bush to resist implementing a policy that would result in escalating the war - and instead has chosen to rely on the proposals drafted by hawkish, think-tank intellectuals that could very well backfire and end up embroiling the United States in an even bloodier conflict."

https://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011107J.shtml



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=American+Enterprise+Institute
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=hawkish
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=think-tank
https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Jason+Leopold

Surge could push troops to the breaking point

Boston Globe
by Cindy Williams

01/10/07

The Bush Administration's proposal to send an additional 20,000 troops to join the 152,000 already in Iraq is is unlikely to bring significant improvement to the situation in Iraq, but it is certain to further damage the already beleaguered US ground forces. The surge will push America's all-volunteer force into uncharted territory, and it is not clear how well the troops or the military as an institution can withstand the strain. The men and women in the Army and Marine Corps today -- many of whom have already served for a year or more in Iraq or Afghanistan -- will bear the brunt, because the Army and Marine Corps cannot grow new troops or units overnight. General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says it would take two years just to recruit, train, and equip 10,000 new troops. Thus to accomplish a surge, the armed forces must look to existing units...

https://tinyurl.com/yb5qre


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

Four ways to stop the war

Slate
by Emily Bazelon

01/10/07

Congress is sticking to gestures in expressing its dissatisfaction with the Iraq War. The new Democratic leadership isn't trying to stop President Bush's planned troop increase. Instead, they're just planning a resolution to express disapproval of it, a measure whose only practical impact will be forcing Republicans to take sides on the issue. But what if Congress were to actually exercise its war powers? The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war and also to decide when to fund and how to regulate the military. But generations of presidents have succeeded in expanding their authority as commander in chief at Congress' expense -- and with its permission, tacit or otherwise. If Congress wanted to push back in Iraq, here's a list of possibilities for what it could do, from cleanest to messiest, legally speaking ...

https://www.slate.com/id/2157392


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp

Surge to come?

Free Market News Network
by Anthony Wile

01/10/07

From an investment standpoint, betting on continued war means making a bet on a continued 'surge' in the price of oil, above all. But past a point, it means betting on the dissipation of the influence of the United States which will be torn asunder by debt, violence, higher taxes, etc. if the war continues or extends into Iraq or Syria. Certainly, the U.S. power elite would be further empowered by quick victories over Iran and Syria, but the chances that war can be waged on four fronts, successfully, are fairly small. The U.S. military knows it. The war may appeal to those who wish to see the destruction of what is left of the American republic, but for others an swift end to the incessant militarization and violence is preferable...

https://www.fmnn.com/Analysis/134/6720/surge.asp?nid=6720&wid=134


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

Bush's Iraq plan faces defiant Congress

Eugene Register-Guard

01/11/07

President Bush's troop-boosting plan for Iraq was headed straight into a political gale in Congress, with Democrats, some Republicans and an increasingly organized anti-war movement arrayed against the buildup. Lawmakers were ready to pounce on the plan Thursday during a day of congressional hearings featuring top Bush administration officials such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates...

https://tinyurl.com/y8kuaf


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

Technically, the Democrats can end America’s presence in Iraq

After Huddle, Democrats May Punt on Iraq

Technically, the Democrats can end America’s presence in Iraq. They control Congress, they have the power over spending, and they can cut off the money that fuels the war.

https://tinyurl.com/y2wwpo


From Information Clearing House

Bush Takes Blame in Iraq, Adds Troops

President Bush on Wednesday acknowledged for the first time he erred by failing to order a military buildup in Iraq last year and said he was increasing U.S. troops by 21,500 to quell the country's near-anarchy. "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me," Bush said.

https://tinyurl.com/vvsl5



Bush rhetoric on Iraq hard to square with facts on diplomacy, reconstruction and more

Bush portrayed the ordinary people of the Middle East as being behind U.S. goals in Iraq, in his speech to the nation Wednesday night.

https://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/01/11/america/NA-GEN-US-Iraq-Fact-Check.php



Troop Surge Already Under Way

President Bush's speech may be scheduled for tonight, but the troop surge in Iraq is already under way.

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/IraqCoverage/story?id=2785532



Once more unto the breach

Bush's revised Iraq strategy is short on new ideas. If it fails he will be more a dead duck than a lame one.

https://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1987301,00.html


From Information Clearing House



https://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=troop+surge

World-News

Independent Media Source

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

The Republican War on...
https://info.commondreams. org/acton/ct/33231/s-0fbd- 2106/Bct/q-003a/l-sf-lead- 0014:208ed/ct13_0/1/lu?sid =TV2%3ALcjACotbo
rudkla - 12. Jun, 05:44
With FBI Reportedly Investigating...
https://info.commondreams. org/acton/ct/33231/s-0fa0- 2106/Bct/q-003a/l-sf-lead- 0014:208ed/ct10_0/1/lu?sid =TV2%3AsishW7bVI
rudkla - 9. Jun, 05:27
Die Kampagnen gegen die...
Allmählich wird das ganze Ausmaß der politischen Attacken...
rudkla - 29. Feb, 16:27
How USDA Climate Change...
https://truthout.org/artic les/how-usda-climate-chang e-denial-threatens-the-sou th/
rudkla - 7. Jul, 05:51
Trump Wants to Create...
https://truthout.org/artic les/its-not-just-about-dep ortations-trump-wants-to-c reate-a-permanent-undercla ss/
rudkla - 7. Jul, 05:48

Archiv

Mai 2026
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
 
 

Status

Online seit 7653 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 12. Jun, 05:44

Credits


Afghanistan
Animal Protection - Tierschutz
AUFBRUCH für Bürgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit
Big Brother - NWO
Britain
Canada
Care2 Connect
Chemtrails
Civil Rights - Buergerrechte - Politik
Cuts in Social Welfare - Sozialabbau
Cybermobbing
Datenschutzerklärung
Death Penalty - Todesstrafe
Depleted Uranium Poisoning (D.U.)
Disclaimer - Haftungsausschluss
EMF-EMR
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
development