Environment Protection - Umweltschutz

Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006

Urgent action for deep sea life: die Tiefsee ist beklagenswert unzureichend vor zerstörerischen Fischfangmethoden wie der Grundschleppnetzfischerei geschützt

https://www.email.greenpeace.org/qznzzz_bzcrerm.html
https://www.email.greenpeace.org/npdzrz_sxdyhlb.html

Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2006

Healthy choices for healthy oceans

https://www.cpaws.org/action/seachoice.php

Montag, 2. Oktober 2006

Protest gegen Hermes-Bürgschaft für Ilisu-Staudamm in der Türkei

02.10.06

Umweltschützer wenden sich gegen die Beteiligung Deutschlands am Bau des Ilisu-Staudamms im Südosten der Türkei, mit dem der Tigris gestaut, eine Fläche von 312 Quadratkilometern überflutet und 1.200 Megawatt Strom erzeugt werden soll. Mit Blick auf die geplanten Türkei-Reisen von Bundesumweltminister Sigmar Gabriel und Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel fordern der Naturschutzbund NABU, die Umweltstiftung WWF und die Entwicklungsorganisation WEED die Bundesregierung auf, keine Hermes-Bürgschaft für das am Bau des Ilisu-Staudamms in der Türkei beteiligte Unternehmen zu gewähren. Die Bundesregierung müsse in Kürze über eine mögliche Hermes-Exportkreditversicherung in Höhe von rund 100 Millionen Euro für das deutsche Bauunternehmen Züblin AG entscheiden.

Die ganze Nachricht im Internet: https://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php?Nr=14440

Donnerstag, 28. September 2006

The deadly price of dirty air: 5,800 fatalities expected this year

$1B for health care, lost workdays

Sep. 25, 2006. 11:35 AM
BY TANYA TALAGA
TORONTO STAR

https://tinyurl.com/gvqmg

More than 5,800 Ontario residents are expected to die prematurely this year because they are breathing dirty air, warns a new report from the Ontario Medical Association.

Breathing pollutant-laden air will cost the province almost $1 billion this year in lost productivity and treatment of smog-related illnesses, the OMA says in the report obtained by the Star.

The Greater Toronto Area was under a smog alert yesterday.

"The impact polluted air is having on the health of Ontarians is dramatically worse than we had initially estimated," said Dr. Greg Flynn, president of the OMA. "We are paying the price for poor air quality with our lives and if we don't take action immediately, the cost will continue to rise significantly."

Science is now available to see the long-term effects of pollution, of how the toxins affect tissue, causing adverse health reactions beyond asthma attacks and breathing difficulties - including contributing to heart attacks and lung cancer.

Smog is a mix of pollutants, made up of mostly ground-level ozone, created from burning gasoline and from other volatile organic compounds found in things like solvents and paints.

The OMA says it now has "clear scientific evidence" of premature deaths for a number of other pollutants such as ozone, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide.

"The cost of inaction is clearly much higher than any price our province could pay to improve air quality," Flynn said.

The report estimates the cost of lost workdays from illnesses related to air pollution - including caregivers' time - at $374 million this year, rising to almost $467 million by 2026.

Health care for air pollution related illnesses, including hospital stays and medications, will cost about $507 million this year, and nearly $702 million by 2026.

The last OMA study, released five years ago, estimated 1,900 deaths that year due to smog-related illnesses.

The sharp increase is a result of two factors: Improved understanding of how pollutants harm the body over time and the fact many more pollutants are now being tracked.

The additional deaths expected this year are also the result of lifetime exposure to dangerous pollutants and the permanent effects on our body, the OMA report notes.

"A physician cannot cure someone whose tissue has accumulated the effects of smog over time," the report says. "All that we can do then is try to manage the illness."

People with asthma suffer greatly for days, even weeks, after a smog alert, said Dr. Mark Greenwald, vice-president of the Asthma Society of Canada, and co-founder of the Asthma Summit happening at York University today. "The asthmatic takes a much longer time to recover," he said. "The trigger is sudden but the effects are longstanding."

Asthmatics say breathing the bad air feels like a plastic bag is over their heads, said Greenwald. "They are afraid and living with this on a daily basis."

Greenwald said the problem of premature deaths caused by air pollution is worse for asthmatics because they don't have good, long-term control of their disease.

A news conference today will outline some of the major findings of the Illness Costs of Air Pollution report, including:

Hospital admissions: More than 16,000 this year will be associated with exposure to air pollution, compared to 9,807 admissions to hospital in 2000.

Trips to emergency departments: Almost 60,000 air-pollution related visits are expected this year, mainly due to cardiovascular and respiratory illness such as asthma. By 2026, the number is seen climbing to 88,000 emergency room visits annually.

Premature deaths: The estimated 5,800 deaths this year is expected to rise to 7,436 by 2015 and 10,061 by 2026. The elderly will be the most vulnerable by far, but infants and children with compromised health conditions are also at risk, the report says.

The report was created using a sophisticated software model developed by the OMA in 2000 to estimate the health effects and economic costs of smog in Ontario.


Informant: Teresa Binstock

Samstag, 23. September 2006

Mass Tourism and Climate Change Could Lead to Destruction of World's Wonders

https://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0922-01.htm

Dienstag, 19. September 2006

Speak out to defend the oceans - Erheben Sie Ihre Stimme zum Schutz der Meere

Speak out to defend the oceans
https://www.email.greenpeace.org/bgekig_ybdvqvf.html

Erheben Sie Ihre Stimme zum Schutz der Meere
https://www.email.greenpeace.org/fgvjvv_vmbczvf.html

Sonntag, 17. September 2006

Scientists baffled by sudden decline of aspen in Rockies

By David Usborne in New York
Published: 16 September 2006

https://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article1603871.ece

There is something doleful about the whispering of the white-barked aspen trees that carpet the slopes of the Rocky Mountains. It is a sound of sickness and death.

Scientists believe that up and down the mountain chain, the aspen trees are beginning to vanish. As many as 10 per cent have died or are ailing in parts of Arizona, Colorado and Utah, according to the surveys. In parts of Alberta, Canada, about 30 per cent of the trees have died in five years.

The greatest problem for the 100 scientists at a conference in Utah last week is that they are not sure what is afflicting the trees."As soon as we understand what's going on, then maybe we can do something about it," said Dale Bartos, a US Forest Service ecologist based in Utah. Tom Wardle, a forester from Colorado, said: "We will, I'm very confident, figure it out."

Researchers are focusing on the unusual reproductive system of the aspen. Instead of distributing seeds, the trees sit upon hugely complex root systems. As older trees die, the roots send up shoots which become saplings.

The greatest worry is that in areas where the trees are in trouble, the shoots are not appearing either. "If we're losing roots," warned Wayne Shepperd, of the US Forest Service, "that's going to change the amount of aspens on the landscape."

One possibility could be the presence of a previously undetected fungus. Recent periods of drought in the American West could be to blame, as well as the eating of shoots by herds of elk as well as human interference with the normal cycles of forest fires. Scientists are also wondering if caterpillars are responsible.


Informant: binstock

--------

September 26, 2006

Emblem of the West Is Dying, and No One Can Figure Out Why

By KATIE KELLEY
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/26/science/earth/26aspen.html

[foto] Kevin Moloney for The New York Times - Dr. Wayne Shepperd among aspen trees in North Park Valley, Colo.

DENVER, Sept. 25 — The aspen, an emblematic tree of the West and the most widely distributed tree in North America, is rapidly and mysteriously dying.

Its rapid decline is bewildering scientists and forest ecologists, who say they cannot pinpoint a cause.

“What’s causing the aspen to die?” asked Wayne Shepperd, a veteran researcher at the Rocky Mountain Research Center of the United States Forest Service. “We don’t know. Maybe this has been there all along, and we haven’t noticed it before, or maybe it’s something new.”

There is no shortage of suspects. Forest experts, who met this month at a conference in Utah to discuss the problem and look for solutions, say it may be insects, drought or climatic stress in general or overgrazing by animals like elk and cattle. Or it may be none or all of the above.

The aspen dieback is particularly baffling in that it seems to be occurring just in some Western states and is not affecting any neighboring trees, many of which already suffer from a plague of mountain pine beetles that has been devastating the West.

Since word of the aspen dieback began spreading last fall, Dr. Shepperd’s office began receiving reports of similar losses throughout the West — not just Colorado, where the problem is most predominant, but also in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Montana, Arizona and southern Wyoming.

But because there has been no concerted investigation, it is not clear how many aspen have died, much less why. “Quite honestly we just don’t have any answers,” Dr. Shepperd said.

The die-off is particularly worrisome because of the special nature of the aspen. The tree reproduces through vegetative regeneration. Genetically identical suckers sprout from the root of one tree and become clones. If the root of an aspen dies, it is unlikely to reproduce.

“We actually dug in a couple of instances and looked for live roots, and we couldn’t find any,” Dr. Shepperd said.

The dieback may go back as far as 1996, at the beginning of the recurrent drought, according to Mary Lou Fairweather, a plant pathologist for the Southwestern region of the Forest Service, who said she first noted the loss of trees in Arizona.

“I started monitoring the dieback on how the trees were growing, when and if it was continuing,” Ms. Fairweather said.

She added that she thought that the first deaths were caused by seasonal climate changes like spring freezes and then accelerated by other factors, including stress affecting the trees, although she noted that those were just theories.

In Utah, Dale Bartos, an aspen ecologist for the Forest Service, agreed that the lack of precipitation had contributed more stress to the aspen than initially thought.

“We’ve been in a major drought over the last few years, and I’m sure this has exacerbated the problem,” Mr. Bartos said.

Dr. Shepperd is not so sure. Although the current drought is probably a factor, he said, extensive long-term studies are needed.

“There’s no real pattern,” he said.

But he has noticed one intriguing clue. Some younger groves of aspen appear to be more resilient than the mature ones.

“Generally, younger stands seem to be healthier,” he said. But he added that it would be discouraging if these younger stands did not sprout. “We’re seeing it across the spectrum of site-conditioned aspen,” he said, meaning that no aspen is safe.

Mr. Bartos estimates that at the current rate 10 percent of the aspens in the West could die within several years. Some of his colleagues call that a conservative estimate.

“We’ve seen in southern Utah, over a period of 12 years, where we have very healthy-looking clones with dark green leaves go to sites where there aren’t any trees left at all,” Mr. Bartos said, adding that in other cases researchers had observed an even quicker rate of decline. “To me, 12 years is fairly rapid when we’re talking about trees that have been on site for 100 to 125 years.” Nevertheless, the scientists who met in Utah to look for a solution came away somewhat hopeful, said John Guyon, a forest pathologist for the Intermountain Regional Office of the Forest Service.

Mr. Guyon said he thought that grazing elk and cattle might be eating away the regenerating aspen. And because the trees thrive after disruptions like avalanches and fires, the lack of such disturbances may be contributing to the dieback.

Jim Worrall, another Forest Service pathologist, said the question was fraught with uncertainty.

“What we don’t know is what the future holds,” Mr. Worrall said. “It’s an unprecedented event.”

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company


Informant: Teresa Binstock

Samstag, 16. September 2006

Save Guimaras - Guimaras and Beyond

Please sign..and forward..

Hugs-pilvi-


Original Message:

THIS IS SO SAD, BUT TRUE, WE HAVE TO WAKE OUR POLITICIANS , SO THEY WILL AVOID THIS TO HAPPEN IN FUTURE, AND LET NATURE WIN THIS FIGHT, IF NOT: WE ARE DOOMED !!!!! PLEASE SIGN AND FORWARD, LOVE YOU,

INGE AND MIKKILINO, DK.

This is very unlike me, but I'm already on my soapbox today. Also, I lived in the Phillipines for two years. Our son was born there.

I have a very soft spot in my heart for the PI and all of the good, hardworking, and wonderful people that live there.

Peace & blessings,

Marge


I would like to write to you all about the recent oil spill tragedy in Guimaras, Philippines. Guimaras is a tiny island in Southern Philippines known for its rich marine biodiversity, white beaches, mangrove and seaweed plantations.

But on August 11, an oil tanker carrying oil from Petron company sank in Guimaras waters affecting as much as 300 kilometers of coastline, 65,000 hectares of mangrove and seaweed plantations including 26,000 individuals displaced from their homes, most of them fishermen who depend on fishing as their livelihood. More than 900 individuals have been treated from respiratory infections and skin diseases due to exposure from high toxic levels of harmful elements and exposure to oil.

Please help me spread awareness by joining me at https://saveguimaras.wordpress.com/ (we will launch https://www.saveguimaras.com/ this week).

You can also visit other groups who are involved in helping Guimaras. https://www.projectsunrise.org
https://sludge.wordpress.com/
forward this letter to your friends.

Thank you

tuesday

Freitag, 15. September 2006

Changing ocean chemistry threatens to harm marine life

By Bruce Lieberman
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
September 14, 2006
VICTORIA FABRY

Census of Marine Life

[fotos] Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Oceans are absorbing rising levels of carbon dioxide and becoming more acidic. The change could be devastating for organisms that build their skeletons from carbonate ions. These include (from top) pteropods, foraminifera, coccolithophores and corals.

Fifty-five million years ago, Earth endured a period of rapid global warming, a shift so dramatic it altered ocean and atmospheric circulation, driving plankton in the seas and mammals on land to extinction.

The event, called the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, may have been caused by volcanic eruptions that flooded the atmosphere with billions of tons of carbon dioxide. Or, methane gas frozen beneath the sea on continental shelves could have destabilized, diffusing into the atmosphere where it was oxidized into CO.

As the oceans absorbed much of the carbon dioxide, their pH fell and they grew increasingly acidified.

Thirty percent to 40 percent of a major class of plankton, called foraminifera, went extinct.

Today, scientists look at that turn in Earth's history with worry. Rising carbon dioxide emitted by the burning of gas, oil and other fossil fuels is being absorbed by the oceans – making them increasingly acidified once again.

Every day, about 22 million tons of CO generated from human activities – primarily from the burning of fossil fuels – are entering the world's oceans. That's 10 times the rate at which carbon dioxide would be absorbed by the oceans if humans did not burn fossil fuels.

Only 200 years after the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, scientists fear that human-generated CO is altering the chemistry and biology of the oceans – perhaps irreversibly. Many types of plankton that form a key part of the ocean food web, as well as coral reefs, could be devastated by falling pH. And it could happen within decades, scientists say.

“It's stunning. I don't know how else to describe it,” said Victoria Fabry, a researcher at California State University San Marcos who studies how ocean acidification threatens tiny and abundant plankton called pteropods. “The impact we're having is very alarming.”

Acidification of the oceans is the sleeping giant of global warming. Scientists are only beginning to understand what the changing chemistry could mean.

But some of the science is clear. As atmospheric CO is absorbed by the oceans, it forms carbonic acid, lowering the pH of seawater. The lower pH, in turn, decreases the availability of chemical building blocks called carbonate ions that many marine organisms need to make their calcium carbonate shells and skeletons.

Threatened plankton include coccolithophores, foraminifera and pteropods, which lie at the bottom of the ocean food chain. Both warm-water corals, such as those at the Great Barrier Reef off Australia, and deep cold-water corals, which provide critical habitats for numerous species of fish, also are in danger.

“There's nothing really controversial about ocean acidification,” Fabry said. “The chemistry is very, very well known. The only unknown is how organisms will respond and how those changes will ripple through ecosystems.”

Scientists had long thought that the world's oceans amounted to a near limitless reservoir that could absorb any CO that humans put into the atmosphere. But the oceans are highly stratified, with layers varied by temperature and salinity, and it takes time for CO to mix completely in the oceans – as many as 1,500 years, said Christopher Sabine, a researcher at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in Seattle.

In fact, 50 percent of the man-made carbon dioxide that's been absorbed by the oceans is still in their upper 1,300 feet, he said.

That is where the oceans have grown more acidified.

Falling pH

The pH scale measures acidity and alkalinity. On the scale, 7.0 is neutral, lower numbers are more acidic, and higher numbers are more alkaline. Battery acid has a pH of about 0, while household bleach has a pH of about 12.


The scale is akin to the Richter scale in that increments in one direction or another change logarithmically – not linearly. Seemingly small differences in pH, then, are large and can have big consequences for ocean chemistry and sea life.

The oceans are actually alkaline, with a pH today of 8.05.

During the last ice age, peak concentrations of CO in the atmosphere measured 180 parts per million, and the corresponding pH of the upper oceans was 8.32, Fabry said.

Just before the Industrial Revolution, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere had risen to 280 parts per million and the pH of the upper oceans had fallen to 8.16, toward the acidic side of the pH scale.

Today, the CO concentration is 380 parts per million and the pH of the upper oceans has dropped further to 8.05.

If CO2 concentrations reach 560 parts per million by the end of the century as some scenarios predict, the pH of the upper oceans will fall more, to 7.91. At 840 parts per million, it will drop to 7.76.

“To put this in historical perspective, this ocean surface pH decrease (to
7.76) would be lower than it has been for more than 20 million years,” said Steve Murkowski, director of scientific programs and chief science adviser at NOAA, during a Congressional hearing in April.

“These are systems that have been in very delicate balance,” Sabine said of the relationship between atmospheric CO and pH in the oceans. “Whenever you mess with that balance, things can go wrong very quickly and in very unexpected ways.”

Dissolving shells

Fabry first noticed that something wasn't right 20 years ago, while on a research cruise in the Gulf of Alaska. While examining a glass jar filled with seawater and swimming pteropods, she observed that the translucent shells of the graceful, snaillike animals were dissolving.

“I thought, 'Wow, that's strange,'” Fabry said. “I couldn't quite believe it.”


CHARLIE NEUMAN / Union-Tribune Victoria Fabry, of California State University San Marcos, sorted through samples of water collected at various locations throughout the Pacific Ocean. She first recorded changes in ocean chemistry due to carbon dioxide 20 years ago. Consumed with other work, Fabry filed the observation away in the back of her mind. Nearly two decades later, scientists in the journal Nature reported that rising CO in seawater inhibited the ability of coccolithophores to form their calcium carbonate shells.

Fabry dug out her pteropod samples and confirmed that their shells had in fact dissolved under elevated CO conditions. A paper on her findings was published in Nature in 2005.

Fabry regards pteropods as “canaries in the coal mine” that signal what might happen throughout the oceans as they acidify. They are a key plankton species in high-latitude oceans, and they are extremely abundant. They're a key food resource for salmon, mackerel, herring and cod.

Impacts to sea life will likely be more severe in higher-latitude seas, because colder water can absorb more carbon dioxide and because seawater there mixes downward into the ocean interior, carrying CO into deeper water, Fabry said. “The problem we have in the high latitudes is that we have low species diversity already, so if you pull (pteropods) out, you know, it's not good,” she said.

Fabry, Sabine and their colleagues referred to these possible shifts in a landmark report in June that summarized the specter of ocean acidification and the need for more study. The report is called “Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs and other Marine Calcifiers.”

Mussels, clams, scallops and more

Scientists are quick to note that much isn't known about precisely how marine life will react to acidifying seas.

Data exist on less than 2 percent of the plankton that build calcium carbonate shells “so that really means we can't make any sweeping statements” about what might happen to them, Fabry said.

But some studies show alarming results. Even small reductions in skeleton-building elements can reduce by 50 percent corals' ability to form their skeletons.

Studies by Chris Langdon at the University of Miami have shown that corals do not adapt to acidification, at least in the short term.

The ocean uptake of CO follows a basic principle of chemistry. If you increase the concentration of a gas over a body of water, the two seek equilibrium, and the water will passively absorb the gas from the air.

Since 1800, about 525 billion tons of carbon dioxide, or one quarter of all the carbon dioxide produced by human activities, has been absorbed by the oceans.

About half remains in the atmosphere, and the other 25 percent has been absorbed by trees and other plants on land.

Even at this astounding rate, the oceans have taken up only about 15 percent of their total capacity.

“The oceans will continue to take up CO for thousands of years,” Sabine said. “We do not have to worry about the oceans running out of capacity.”

But in near-term time scales, acidification in the upper oceans could make the seas a very different place.

“The oceans are performing this great service for mankind, absorbing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, and they will continue to do that,” Sabine said. “But the consequence of that is that we're changing the chemistry of the oceans.”

For people in the San Diego region, a trip to tidal pools at the coast may give them an idea of what they might lose. Numerous bottom dwellers such as mussels, clams, scallops, sea urchins and starfish develop during a planktonic period in which their calcium carbonate shells are critical to their survival, Fabry said.

“If they have increased mortality due to elevated carbon dioxide, that will change all (bottom-dwelling) coastal communities,” she said. “When you just start thinking about this – it's really overwhelming.”

Find this article at: https://www.signonsandiego.com/news/science/20060914-9999-lz1c14acid.html


Informant: binstock

Donnerstag, 14. September 2006

Some new petitions

A message from NANCY

Original Message

Here are some new ones to please sign and cross post.

7 Brand New Animal Petitions

New Animal/Wildlife Petitions:

Justice for Greyhound Mix & Other Abused / Killed Dogs
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/451360147

Save Coyotes, Pheasants, Burrowing Owls, Etc.
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/942461884

Stop Infashion Magazine's Use & Promotion of Fur
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/622403516

Save the Cogghall Park Geese
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/545457993

Tell President Bush To Help Alaska's Wolves
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/295248763


New Environment Petitions:

Take a Stand Against Global Climate Change - Pledge Action Today!
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/975797477

Join The Million Bulb Swap Out to Fight Global Warming
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/916022327

Please sign/forward the petition to save our wetlands. Sponsor,- Judy E.
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/925517279

World-News

Independent Media Source

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

The Republican War on...
https://info.commondreams. org/acton/ct/33231/s-0fbd- 2106/Bct/q-003a/l-sf-lead- 0014:208ed/ct13_0/1/lu?sid =TV2%3ALcjACotbo
rudkla - 12. Jun, 05:44
With FBI Reportedly Investigating...
https://info.commondreams. org/acton/ct/33231/s-0fa0- 2106/Bct/q-003a/l-sf-lead- 0014:208ed/ct10_0/1/lu?sid =TV2%3AsishW7bVI
rudkla - 9. Jun, 05:27
Die Kampagnen gegen die...
Allmählich wird das ganze Ausmaß der politischen Attacken...
rudkla - 29. Feb, 16:27
How USDA Climate Change...
https://truthout.org/artic les/how-usda-climate-chang e-denial-threatens-the-sou th/
rudkla - 7. Jul, 05:51
Trump Wants to Create...
https://truthout.org/artic les/its-not-just-about-dep ortations-trump-wants-to-c reate-a-permanent-undercla ss/
rudkla - 7. Jul, 05:48

Archiv

April 2025
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Status

Online seit 7275 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 12. Jun, 05:44

Credits


Afghanistan
Animal Protection - Tierschutz
AUFBRUCH für Bürgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit
Big Brother - NWO
Britain
Canada
Care2 Connect
Chemtrails
Civil Rights - Buergerrechte - Politik
Cuts in Social Welfare - Sozialabbau
Cybermobbing
Datenschutzerklärung
Death Penalty - Todesstrafe
Depleted Uranium Poisoning (D.U.)
Disclaimer - Haftungsausschluss
EMF-EMR
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
development